Criminal Psychotics or simply Psychotics |
These are users who enjoy
annoying others in the worst ways they know how, and will
typically intentionally try to provoke wizards into killing them.
Typical quotations:
- "Suck my Dick" (repeated 100 times by hitting up arrow return)
- "<insert wizards name here> is a bitch and deserves to die"
- "Kill me Kill Me Kill Me"
Psychotics are generally the easiest to identify, and are probably
the only case where a `kill without warning may be required.
However, be careful not to confuse a "child" with a "psychotic".
Psychotics will typically attempt to return immediately when
killed, a fact that can be identified by `trackip and
prevented somewhat by a judicious use of `banip.
|
Children |
A child is a young user (typically <= 15 years old) who
delights in the freedoms of the Palace, and gets a kick out of
seeing the word "fuck" appear on his computer, probably because he
is not allowed to use the word at home. Children can easily be
confused with "Psychotics" but there are important differences.
One big difference is that children can usually be "talked down".
Typical behaviors for children:
- Repeating the ")Wind" sound 20 times.
- Saying "Anyone want to screw?"
- Wearing a "Kill All Guests" Sign (or a name like ".Guest Killa.")
A Child's level of abuse may vary greatly at different times,
depending on the hormone levels. A Child's level of abuse may be
borderline and may intentionally be just provocative enough to
piss you off, but not enough to kick. Such is life. In many cases
it is better to `gag a child (see below) rather than to
`kill a child, thus confirming the Puritan notion that
"children are better seen than heard".
|
Breathers |
A Breather is someone who continually propositions
every user with a remotely feminine name or appearance to have
sex, typically (but not always) using private messages. There are
two varieties:
- Horny Breathers
- A horny breather simply wants to have sex.
Unlike the psychotic variety, the horny breather will go away
when asked. Probably the best thing to do with a horny
breather is to tell him to "take it upstairs". Typical quote
"Will you go upstairs with me"?
- Psychotic Breathers
- A psychotic breather specifically is trying
to offend, and when greeted by a negative response, will
persist even harder. Psychotic breathers tend to be much more
obscene and offensive than the milder variety. In some cases
it may be possible to fend off a psychotic breather by acting
receptive, but this is probably a crap shoot
a clear-cut
Psychotic Breather should be killed.
In both cases, Breathers who use private messages to other members
present problems, because we can't monitor
chat. You are essentially taking the word of one member over
another's. In most instances, this is pretty clear cut, but
nonetheless, I would suggest asking for specific examples.
It is not enough that a member named "Jane" says "Guest 3412 is
being rude to me". It's possible that Jane is 12 years old and is
offended by words she doesn't understand, like "existential".
It's also possible that Jane has a personal vendetta against Guest
3412, or is playing a game (sometimes with others) called "Kill
the Guest" which aims to trick wizards into bumping-off random,
innocent guests. In these cases, ask Jane to give you more
specifics ideally quoting directly from her log window. This
would also be a good time to explain the 'mute and 'hide
commands to Jane.
When users have complained about Breathers in the past, we have
had some success by "going undercover"
to catch them in the act.
Related to breathers are users who have explicit sexual
conversations in the open, rather than in a private room or via
whisper. Are they clueless?
Or wanting to provoke others outside
their conversation? Hard to say, but my usual practice is to
quietly `gag them (long enough to get a word in edgeways), tell
them to continue but only privately, and unceremoniously
`ungag them. Unless it continues, of course.
|
Depressives |
A depressive is a user who is not very happy and is
using the Palace as a form of personal therapy/escape.
Depressives may act perfectly normal on some days, but on other
days may act exceedingly weird, and make unusual bids for
attention. Depressives are typically Members, rather than guests,
and will take it very personally when killed. They don't want to
be killed, they want someone to talk to them, and this is probably
the best approach, if you are up for it.
|
New from AOL/IRC |
Users who are new to the Palace and come from IRC or AOL bring a
different culture with them. For example on AOL, it is considered
normal/acceptable behavior to continually spout the following
lines:
- "M or F?"
- "Age/Location Check?"
- "Any SWFs out there?"
Certainly this type of behavior is not worthy of being kicked, but
if you would like to see less of it on the Palace perhaps you can
do what many people do and provide utterly inappropriate replies,
such as "I am a zygote, and I live in a tea kettle".
|
Utterly Clueless |
Some users are so clueless that they do things that can be interpreted
as abusive even though they don't intend to. Some new users, for
example, habitually hit the return key twice (kind of like hitting
the elevator button twice). They may do unexpected things like
wearing nude props at the front gate. Such users are in need of
education, rather than reprimands. There have been instances where
such users also didn't know English (which exacerbates the
problem). A glance at the IP address is a good idea if you think
this might be the case.
|
Parodists |
Some users reproduce the behaviors of other abusive types in an attempt
at humor. There's been at least one instance where a tired
wizard, weary from a session of endless kills, killed such a user
without warning. Perhaps this is why there is a sign at the
airport asking you to refrain from talking about bombs at the
metal detector. This is another good reason why it is good to talk
to users before killing them. The point is that after you've met
and killed 13 Psychotics, it is easy to pigeonhole people -
especially Guests who are wearing the same props. Don't. The "15
yr old psychotic" you are killing may actually be a 45 year old
psychiatrist.
|
Sleepers and Ghosts |
Sleepers are users who have walked away from their computers. Sleepers
are completely unresponsive. For the most part, sleeper's should
be ignored (not killed) unless the sleeper is in a private room.
In this case the sleeper should be warned, given 20 minutes, and
then killed. The reason for the private room is because the
sleeper may be an eavesdropper. 20 minutes is needed to insure
that the sleeper isn't simply lagging. When killing a sleeper it
is important to use a death penatly of zero when killing them.
For example:
'kill 0 Sleepy
There have been instances where a presumed sleeper was killed who
turned out to be lagging. Because the "default" death penalty was
used, the user wasn't able to get back on.
A ghost is like a sleeper, but their computer may have disconnected
in a nasty way for example, due to a local power failure. A good
way for a wizard to test this is to use ;allscray to get the user to say something if
they respond to allscray, their computer is still connected. Sometimes
the finger script can be used for the same
purpose.
If you are a wizard with an asterisk leading your name (e.g, *Dr.X),
and the room has ;allscray or ;ao, try whispering this to a suspected
ghost:
;ao "I'm Here" SAY
|
Eavesdroppers |
An eavesdropper typically waits in one of the private rooms or in
Hallway 200 and attempts to eavesdrop on private conversations in
the bedrooms. Eavesdroppers typically use "invisible" props and
have very brief names such as "." or "l" or " ". Thus far, for the most
part, eavesdroppers have been ignored, but it is a good idea to
warn other users about them from time to time. The best way to
detect an eavesdropper is to keep an eye on the number of users as
shown in the status bar. An eavesdropper who won't leave a private
room when requested should be warned, and killed, if necessary
(see Sleepers above).
|
Blockers or Cyberfrotteurs |
Blockers stand in front of other users, or invade their personal space.
For the most part, jbum thinks that Blockers should not be
killed, and if you really feel it is necessary, he suggests
killing them for a short period of time (say 1 minute). Often
blockers are lagging, and they may not be responsive to your
commands for that reason.
Since blockers are abusing physical space, it is appropriate to
`pin them, if they're obviously doing it to be obnoxious.
This is one of the few instances where `pin is appropiate
(It is not appropriate to use `pin if someone is abusing
the language only).
A note here about `pin. When a user is `pinned
down in the corner, his props are stripped off and a new prop
is placed on him. That prop might look like chains, but let's
call it what is really is: a diaper. When the naughty
user learns to be a big boy and put his potty where it
belongs, he doesn't have to wear the diaper any more.
There, that's a good boy. Daddy is proud.
The botbot provides
shove and mv commands that can also be used on
many blockers they simply move the offending user to
some less obtrusive location.
|
Friends |
I have seen at least two occasions where a wizard has killed
a friend as a joke. Don't.
|
Hackers |
There have been a few dedicated hackers, people who have strived
to duplicate or subvert the palace's registration scheme; to get
the client software to do things it wasn't meant to; to become
"false wizards;" or to outright steal
(usually through deception)
other users' registration numbers. If caught, it's usually wise to
quickly dispatch these people.
|
Gangstaz |
Several "gang" groups have sprouted up over the past moons, most
notably the Legion (and to some minds, the ?Magus). At thier
height, some of these groups have even loosely allied themselves,
usually around the common battle cry of "death to the wizards!"
As far as I've been able to discern, these groups have been
composed mainly (entirely?) of children. Most
wish they were hackers. Some may be mistaking
their association with a Palace "gang" for association with a
Quake Clan. They come and go in much the same way that other
cliques and groupings of teenagers usually do fairly spontaneously. They
gain a sense of power from their numbers (witness the common
"snert storm" onslaughts around school break times), and often
share expertise between them expertise gained from relentless
attempts to hack and subvert the palace software and the culture
of large sites. While annoying, sometimes these groups reveal new
ideas or discover security holes. For all their arrogance and
surface hostility, they also bring a lot of dynamism. One real
downside: they are sometimes involved in scams.
|
Rabble Rousers and Political Paranoids |
Every gang has at its core a masta gangsta. Sometime the group
collapses without this scion; other times it lionizes him if he's
banned. And there are many would-be gang leaders out there, too usually
members who are bitter about not being a wizard, or about any
number of other social woes, and think that by attacking the
Palace, and inciting outhers to do the same, they are somehow
improving the world or more likely their place in it.
Often, they mistake the Palace (and especially Communiteis.com
itself) as some sort
of symbol for the entirety of industrialized society, and likewise
mistake wizzes bumping them off the server for genuine
jurisprudence. This is a big fat red herring, and you shouldn't
fall for it. Palace is no court of law, and the rights that a
criminal defendant may be guaranteed have little, if anything, to
do directly with the "rights" of a palace user.
Since these people often see themselves as some sort of tiny folk
hero (and often declare themselves above the law in great
self-righteous rants), they are easily engaged if they think you
want to hear their New World Plan. This is one way to waste your
time if you don't feel that `gag or `kill is (yet)
appropriate.
A common element of this rant is the notion that the rabble rouser
is outside the jurisdiction of either California/Oregon statutes
(various Communities.com
servers are in California or Oregon), or of US statues, etc... either
because the Rabble Rouser is located in Australia or Quebec, or
because they believe that they have some sort of cloak of anonymity that will protect
them. Don't fall for it. Attacks (and many RRs do attempt
to incite others into aggravated denial-of-service attacks, or
particpation in scams) can be prosecuted at
the location of the victim, not just the attacker. This is
known in legal circles as "Objective Jurisdiction" and was most
spectacularly demonstrated in the Manuel Noriega case.
Another common rant is "Freedom of Speech," in which the snert
asserts he's got the right to send anyone any message, any time
even
profane personal attacks. This is simply false, and no owner of
any palace site is required to provide the net bandwidth for such
a jerk to use as a soapbox. U.S. citizen or not. Taxpayer or
(usually) not.
A bizarre recent variant of this have been snerts who declare
themselves postmodern and hence anything they have to say is
inherently intelligent and meta-informed, while their detractors
are conveniently ignored as tools of the Old Order. These are
essentially 90's versions of the sort of ineffectual twits one
used to see during the 1970's mumbling about how things would
change after "the revolution, man." In some cases, they are
perhaps even the same people, hacking up the same tired ideological
hairballs.
Yet one more mistaken immunity that some snerts claim is that they are
minors, and therefore free from direct prosecution, and therefore
free to do any stupid thing that they so please. As if!
While it only sometimes makes an impression, it
may sometimes help to quote to some snerts passages from
their own ISP Terms of Service Agreements. Often you can
find the text of such an agreement by checking to see if the
snert's ISP has a master web site, such as
"http://www.someISPname.com/". The ToS is usually printed
right there. As you might expect, in most cases deliberate snert
behavior is a violation of the ToS, a contract that you already
know the snert had to have signed.
|
Rogue Robots |
As far as I know, this has only happened once. And only one wizard
was killed by the robot. The less said about that, the better
^_^;;
|
Impostors |
Impostors at the Main Palace sites are easily (and often) caught
especially since one of the most-common impostor targets are
well-known wizards. The impostors may try to pull stupid stunts as
someone else, to alienate or cause scandal for that user for
example, by running around insulting someone's friends while
wearing that persons' name and distinctive props.
At main palace, it's generally been considered a "terminal offense"
to go about impersonating wizards, largely because wizard
impostoring is often part of a scam. In many
cases, the administrators of the impostor's ISP have also been
contacted (and in some rare
cases, the impostor's parents).
Non-wizard members are also often impersonated particularly, it
seems, members prominent in groups like the ?Magus or occasionally
by impostors who seem to think they will play some sort of
sexual-intimacy mind game on the unwitting victims, ie
propositioning someone for cybersex under an assumed palace
identity. This is extreme harrassment in my book, and the offender
should be toasted without compunction.
Impostors shouldn't be confused with
cyberspace gendernauts. If you want to present yourself as
any particular gender (or none), so what?
It's easy for anyone to spot an impostor wiz, because the impostor
can't put on the "badge": an asterisk as the first character of
their name (e.g., *saintj).
At Main, all wizards will always don their badge if
asked. They will never say "not now." And no, there are no
bitter, disgruntled ex-wizards lurking incognito, either. Believe
me, one of the hardest things for a wiz to do is to hide from the
other wizards.
A few wizard impersonators, thinking themselves very clever, have
made tiny props containing the * to place in front of their
names. These props don't work except on their computer,
because they can never know if the person viewing them has the
same fonts or has names turned on; and no prop asterisk will ever
appear in the log.
It's even easier for a wizard to spot an impostor because a wiz
can examine the IP addresses and unique member registration keystamps.
Some wizards (not naming names....) keep very, very,
detailed records, and can spot an alias from a mile off.
A particularly difficult kind of impostoring to control is
pretending to be someone at a different site. There have been
plenty of cases of fake jbums, fake horses, and others appearing
at random small palace sites and usually making a lot of pointless
threats or insulting comments. Fortunately, such instances have
always been quickly resolved by the local wizards at those sites
(who as often as not have been the direct targets of such
attacks).
|
Scam Artists |
There are a few simple scams that can (and have) been run on palace
sites.
- The AOL Scam
- So named because it seems to have originated at AOL (or at least
first gained notoriety in the public press there). A new member
(the victim)
is greeted by another member (the scammer),
working as a fraud or an impostor.
The scam artist informs the victim that they are either a
wizard, or some other Communities.com employee, or a Netcom employee, an
ex-wizard, etc. They then ask the new member for information
particularly the new member's registration key,
occasionally even Visa #'s, real name, ISP info, and the like.
The scammer then vanishes with the stolen information, which
they can then pass on to their little snert pals or use to
prevent the victim from subsequent logins.
A variation of this scam has also been used on
more-established users the snert tells them that they have
been chosen to be a wizard (sometimes by lottery, of all
things). The snert promises to make them a wizard once they
tell him their registration number....
It's important to remember: fraud is not just jerk behavior,
it's a crime, even in cyberspace. And password theft/forgery
is a specific
crime in many states. So are "denial of service" crimes, which
violate U.S. communications laws going back to the 1930's.
- The Picture Scam
- A few people have reported scam artists who work mouch more
like "traditional" confidence artists
becoming
apparently-close personal friends, then turning ill-got
personal information against the victim. In one notorious
case, a user (who may have been a man, but advertised as a
bisexual woman) was actually collecting nude photos
of users photos sent by the users who thought they were
emailing intimate
gifts to a friend. In fact, the scammer was taking the
photos and posting them on a pay-per-view web site.
Unfortunately, there's not much a wizard can do about this
sort of scam. In the above case, the scammer had her cover
blown, but there wasn't much more that the wizards could do
other than warn other potential victims.
This writer has no tolerance for scam artists. `pin `gag `kill `ban
and send a nasty note to their ISP.
|
True Stalkers |
So far, these have been few and far between. Like various
poseur gangstaz, stalkers may believe that they are immune to
U.S.
Statutes regarding communications or stalking in general. This
is very stupid. Stalking is a crime in the U.S. and and one state
(Delaware) even considers a first offense to be a felony.
Therefore a responsible wizard should take the furthest available
step call not only the snert stalker's ISP
into play, but the stalker's local police department as well.
Such an action can be very
upsetting to the wiz. Like anyone, they log onto chat systems to
have fun, to talk with friends, to unwind. It's not a comfortable
thing to have that simple recreation turned into a crime scene.
But better to take such actions right away than to live down the
alternatives.
|